Kendall Richards
How a particular view of language enables neoliberalism in student support – and how to resist it.
Richards, Kendall; Pilcher, Nick
Abstract
In this presentation, extending previous research, the authors argue that a particular view of language which sees it as a concrete abstract objectivist entity separable from any context for analysis and teaching underpins neoliberal approaches to supporting students in higher education. Universities worldwide have glossaries of terms such as ‘describe’ or ‘discuss’, and centralized units to help students understand what an ‘essay’ or ‘report’ is, and to ‘critically evaluate’. This approach is ideal for enabling neo-liberalism, giving it persuasive power, and underpinning arguments to create low-cost support, applicable to all subjects and students, deliverable by almost anyone. Here, drawing on theory and data, we present and discuss examples to show how language is instead an individual subjectivist entity, unique to context and subject, and requires support for students be undertaken by lecturers through dialogue in the subject context. Such support recognises the multidimensionality of language and the plurality of values that the different subjects have. We argue that current approaches to support should be changed to reflect this individual subjectivist nature of language, thereby resisting neoliberalism and giving lecturers greater freedom to educate and to improve student and lecturer relationships by providing a person focused support.
Citation
Richards, K., & Pilcher, N. (2020, May). How a particular view of language enables neoliberalism in student support – and how to resist it. Paper presented at DPR20 Discourse, Power and Resistance the values of education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Presentation Conference Type | Conference Paper (unpublished) |
---|---|
Conference Name | DPR20 Discourse, Power and Resistance the values of education |
Start Date | May 11, 2020 |
End Date | May 13, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Mar 4, 2020 |
Keywords | Neoliberalism, Pedagogy, Rhetoric, Doscourse |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2594094 |
You might also like
Dialogues: ‘QUANT’ researchers on ‘QUAL’ methods.
(2016)
Journal Article
Port governance in Taiwan: How hypocrisy helps meet aspirations of change
(2016)
Journal Article
National Qualification Frameworks: developing research perspectives.
(2009)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search