G Riddington
Evaluating train protection systems
Riddington, G; Beck, M; Cowie, J
Abstract
This paper arose from the work carried out for the Cullen/Uff Joint Inquiry into Train Protection Systems. It is concerned with the problem of evaluating the benefits of safety enhancements in order to avoid rare, but catastrophic accidents, and the role of Operations Research in the process. The problems include both input values and representation of outcomes. A key input is the value of life. This paper briefly discusses why the value of life might vary from incident to incident and reviews alternative estimates before producing a 'best estimate' for rail. When the occurrence of an event is uncertain, the normal method is to apply a single 'expected' value. This paper argues that a more effective method of representing such situations is through Monte-Carlo simulation and demonstrates the use of the methodology on a case study of the decision as to whether or not advanced train protection (ATP) should have been installed on a route to the west of London. This paper suggests that the output is more informative than traditional cost-benefit appraisals or engineering event tree approaches. It also shows that, unlike the results from utilizing the traditional approach, the value of ATP on this route would be positive over 50% of the time.
Citation
Riddington, G., Beck, M., & Cowie, J. (2004). Evaluating train protection systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(6), 606-613. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601724
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 1, 2003 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 21, 2017 |
Publication Date | 2004-06 |
Deposit Date | Mar 11, 2008 |
Journal | Journal of the Operational Research Society |
Print ISSN | 0160-5682 |
Electronic ISSN | 1476-9360 |
Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 55 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 606-613 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601724 |
Keywords | Accidents; Probability; Advanced train protection; ATP; Safety measures; Cost-benefit; Rail transport; Risk; Simulation; |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/1889 |
Contract Date | Mar 11, 2008 |
You might also like
Subsidy and productivity in the privatised British passenger railway.
(2002)
Journal Article
Performance, profit and consumer sovereignty in the English deregulated bus market
(2014)
Journal Article
Reregulating the deregulated, a case study of the Scottish Bus market.
(2014)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Productivity and performance in the British rail freight industry since privatisation.
(2010)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search