Prof Mark Huxham M.Huxham@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Collecting student feedback: a comparison of questionnaire and other methods
Huxham, Mark; Laybourn, Phyllis; Cairncross, Sandra; Gray, Morag; Brown, Norrie; Goldfinch, Judy; Earl, Shirley
Authors
Phyllis Laybourn
Sandra Cairncross
Morag Gray
Norrie Brown
Judy Goldfinch
Shirley Earl
Abstract
A study was conducted comparing the feedback received from students about teaching obtained using different instruments. Twelve first- and second-year undergraduate modules were selected from seven different schools within a single university. Students studying each module were allocated to 'questionnaire' and 'comparator' groups. 'Questionnaire' students completed the standard end-of-module questionnaire, whilst 'comparator' groups evaluated the modules using 'rapid feedback', 'H form', focus group and reflective diary methods. The responses of 335 students to questionnaires were compared with those of 160 using the other methods; no results were obtained from the reflective diary students. Only a minority of the issues raised by students using the comparator methods were covered by the questionnaire, and the comparator methods showed different rankings of the issues in common. The key difference between questionnaire and comparator methods was the use of closed and open questions respectively, with comparator methods being more appropriate for formative evaluation
Citation
Huxham, M., Laybourn, P., Cairncross, S., Gray, M., Brown, N., Goldfinch, J., & Earl, S. (2008). Collecting student feedback: a comparison of questionnaire and other methods. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 675-686. doi:10.1080/02602930701773000
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2008-12 |
Deposit Date | May 8, 2009 |
Print ISSN | 0260-2938 |
Electronic ISSN | 1469-297X |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 33 |
Pages | 675-686 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701773000 |
Keywords | student feedback data; evaluation methods; teaching quality; questionnaires; learning experience; |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/2576 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930701773000 |
You might also like
Rapid Losses of Surface Elevation following Tree Girdling and Cutting in Tropical Mangroves
(2014)
Journal Article
Making predictions of mangrove deforestation: a comparison of two methods in Kenya.
(2013)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search