Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Weighting the competitiveness factors for container ports under conflicting interests

Yeo, G T; Song, Dong-Wook; Dinwoodie, J; Roe, M


G T Yeo

Dong-Wook Song

J Dinwoodie

M Roe


Generally, an evaluation of container port competitiveness is regarded as a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem which involves various stakeholders with conflicting interests. To solve MCDM problems, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method has been popular, but problems arise in managing uncertainty among decision makers, and contradictory opinions. The key issue discussed in this paper is how to obtain compromise weights (CWs) using a combined AHP procedure. This procedure incorporates Dempster-Shafer theory for eliminating uncertainty in the evaluation, and a levelling process for adjusting the contradictory opinions of each group, a so-called multiple decision-making group problem. For an empirical analysis, container ports located in Northeast Asia, known to exhibit severe port competition, were selected. Using an adoption of the methodology, the matrix of CWs was obtained. Using this matrix permits an exact evaluation of competitiveness in the sampled container ports.


Yeo, G. T., Song, D., Dinwoodie, J., & Roe, M. (2009). Weighting the competitiveness factors for container ports under conflicting interests. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 1249-1257.

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date 2009
Deposit Date Apr 10, 2014
Print ISSN 0160-5682
Electronic ISSN 1476-9360
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 61
Pages 1249-1257
Keywords Container ports; multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM); analytic hierarchy process (AHP); compromise weights (CWs); Dempster-Shafer theory; uncertainty;
Public URL
Publisher URL