Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Rethinking Childhood Contributory Negligence: 'Blame', 'Fault' - but what about Children's Rights?

Macfarlane, Lesley-Anne

Authors

Lesley-Anne Macfarlane



Abstract

Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child provides that the child’s ‘best interests… shall be a primary consideration’ in all actions concerning the child. The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child has indicated something of the magnitude of the concept of best interests, describing it as ‘a substantive right’, ‘a fundamental interpretative legal principle’ and ‘a rule of procedure’. In many areas of domestic law the child’s best interests are discernible as a consideration when decisions are made that have an impact on children. However, the child’s best interests are not recognised as being of primary, or indeed of any, consequence in determinations about childhood contributory negligence. Further, judgments about the contributory negligence of the young often indicate inconsistent, and unpredictable, approaches and outcomes concerning children. This article contextualises the issue of childhood contributory fault within wider UK law and analyses the position of children in the field of delict/tort with reference to two high profile decisions, Probert v Moore and Jackson v Murray. A number of options for reform of the law, practice and policy are proposed – including a Children’s Civil Injuries Compensation Scheme – that would render the way the legal systems in the United Kingdom address the contributory negligence of children more compliant with Article 3.

Citation

Macfarlane, L. (2018). Rethinking Childhood Contributory Negligence: 'Blame', 'Fault' - but what about Children's Rights?. Juridical Review, 75-97

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 16, 2018
Publication Date 2018-06
Deposit Date Feb 23, 2018
Publicly Available Date Jul 1, 2019
Journal Juridical review
Print ISSN 0022-6785
Publisher Sweet and Maxwell
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Issue 2
Pages 75-97
Keywords United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 3, best interests of the child as a primary consideration, delict/tort, contributory negligence
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/1049529

Files

Rethinking childhood contributory negligence... (124 Kb)
Document

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in The Juridical Review] following peer review. The definitive published version: Macfarlane, L. (2018). Rethinking Childhood Contributory Negligence: 'Blame', 'Fault' - but what about Children's Rights?. Juridical Review, 75-97 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service


Rethinking Childhood Contributory Negligence: 'Blame', 'Fault' - but what about Children's Rights? (241 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in The Juridical Review following peer review. The definitive published version: Macfarlane, L. (2018). Rethinking Childhood Contributory Negligence: 'Blame', 'Fault' - but what about Children's Rights?. Juridical Review, 75-97 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service






You might also like



Downloadable Citations