Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Development and validation of self-reported line drawings of the modified Beighton score for the assessment of generalised joint hypermobility

Cooper, Dale J.; Scammell, Brigitte E.; Batt, Mark E.; Palmer, Debbie

Authors

Dale J. Cooper

Brigitte E. Scammell

Mark E. Batt

Debbie Palmer



Abstract

Background: The impracticalities and comparative expense of carrying out a clinical assessment is an obstacle in many large epidemiological studies. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a series of electronic self-reported line drawing instruments based on the modified Beighton scoring system for the assessment of selfreported generalised joint hypermobility.
Methods: Five sets of line drawings were created to depict the 9-point Beighton score criteria. Each instrument consisted of an explanatory question whereby participants were asked to select the line drawing which best represented their joints. Fifty participants completed the self-report online instrument on two occasions, before attending a clinical assessment. A blinded expert clinical observer then assessed participants’ on two occasions,
using a standardised goniometry measurement protocol. Validity of the instrument was assessed by participant observer
agreement and reliability by participant repeatability and observer repeatability using unweighted Cohen’s kappa (k). Validity and reliability were assessed for each item in the self-reported instrument separately, and for the sum of the total scores. An aggregate score for generalised joint hypermobility was determined based on a Beighton score of 4 or more out of 9.
Results: Observer-repeatability between the two clinical assessments demonstrated perfect agreement (k 1.00; 95%
CI 1.00, 1.00). Self-reported participant-repeatability was lower but it was still excellent (k 0.91; 95% CI 0.74, 1.00). The
participant-observer agreement was excellent (k 0.96; 95% CI 0.87, 1.00). Validity was excellent for the self-report instrument, with a good sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.81, 0.91) and excellent specificity of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98, 1.00).
Conclusions: The self-reported instrument provides a valid and reliable assessment of the presence of generalised
joint hypermobility and may have practical use in epidemiological studies

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 19, 2017
Online Publication Date Jan 17, 2018
Publication Date 2018-12
Deposit Date Jan 18, 2018
Publicly Available Date Jan 19, 2018
Journal BMC Medical Research Methodology
Publisher BMC
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 18
Issue 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0464-8
Keywords Generalised joint hypermobility, Validation, Self-report
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/1027490
Contract Date Jan 18, 2018

Files







You might also like



Downloadable Citations