Emma F France
Why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography qualitative synthesis
France, Emma F; Wells, Mary; Lang, Heidi; Williams, Brian
Authors
Mary Wells
Heidi Lang
Brian Williams
Abstract
Background: Meta-ethnography is a unique, systematic, qualitative synthesis approach widely used to provide robust evidence on patient and clinician beliefs and experiences and understandings of complex social phenomena. It can make important theoretical and conceptual contributions to health care policy and practice. Results Since beliefs, experiences, health care contexts and social phenomena change over time, the continued relevance of the findings from meta-ethnographies cannot be assumed. However, there is little guidance on whether, when and how meta-ethnographies should be updated; Cochrane guidance on updating reviews of intervention effectiveness is unlikely to be fully appropriate. This is the first in-depth discussion on updating a meta-ethnography; it explores why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography. Three main methods of updating the analysis and synthesis are examined. Advantages and disadvantages of each method are outlined, relating to the context, purpose, process and output of the update and the nature of the new data available. Recommendations are made for the appropriate use of each method, and a worked example of updating a meta-ethnography is provided. Conclusions This article makes a unique contribution to this evolving area of meta-ethnography methodology.
Citation
France, E. F., Wells, M., Lang, H., & Williams, B. (2016). Why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography qualitative synthesis. Systematic Reviews, 5, Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0218-4
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 24, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 15, 2016 |
Publication Date | Mar 15, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Sep 29, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 29, 2016 |
Journal | Systematic Reviews |
Print ISSN | 2046-4053 |
Electronic ISSN | 2046-4053 |
Publisher | BMC |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 5 |
Article Number | 44 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0218-4 |
Keywords | Cancer; Qualitative analysis; Meta-ethnography; Meta-synthesis; Systematic reviews |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/396039 |
Files
Why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography qualitative synthesis
(1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© France et al. 2016 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search