Dr Arthur Bossi A.Bossi@napier.ac.uk
Consultant - MTBCOS
Dr Arthur Bossi A.Bossi@napier.ac.uk
Consultant - MTBCOS
Guilherme G. Matta
Guillaume Y. Millet
Pedro Lima
Leonardo C. Pertence
Jorge P. de Lima
James G. Hopker
Purpose:
To describe pacing strategy in a 24-h running race and its interaction with sex, age group, athletes’ performance group, and race edition.
Methods:
Data from 398 male and 103 female participants of 5 editions were obtained based on a minimum 19.2-h effective-running cutoff. Mean running speed from each hour was normalized to the 24-h mean speed for analyses.
Results:
Mean overall performance was 135.6 ± 33.0 km with a mean effective-running time of 22.4 ± 1.3 h. Overall data showed a reverse J-shaped pacing strategy, with a significant reduction in speed from the second-to-last to the last hour. Two-way mixed ANOVAs showed significant interactions between racing time and both athlete performance group (F = 7.01, P < .001, ηp2 = .04) and race edition (F = 3.01, P < .001, ηp2 = .02) but not between racing time and either sex (F = 1.57, P = .058, ηp 2 < .01) or age group (F = 1.25, P = .053, ηp2 = .01). Pearson product–moment correlations showed an inverse moderate association between performance and normalized mean running speed in the first 2 h (r = –.58, P < .001) but not in the last 2 h (r = .03, P = .480).
Conclusions:
While the general behavior represents a rough reverse J-shaped pattern, the fastest runners start at lower relative intensities and display a more even pacing strategy than slower runners. The “herd behavior” seems to interfere with pacing strategy across editions, but not sex or age group of runners.
Bossi, A. H., Matta, G. G., Millet, G. Y., Lima, P., Pertence, L. C., de Lima, J. P., & Hopker, J. G. (2017). Pacing Strategy During 24-Hour Ultramarathon-Distance Running. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(5), 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0237
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | May 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Aug 16, 2022 |
Journal | International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance |
Print ISSN | 1555-0265 |
Electronic ISSN | 1555-0273 |
Publisher | Human Kinetics |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 12 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 590-596 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2016-0237 |
Keywords | ultraendurance; work distribution; competitive behavior; gender; track and field |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2896952 |
Laboratory predictors of uphill cycling performance in trained cyclists
(2016)
Journal Article
Optimizing Interval Training Through Power-Output Variation Within the Work Intervals
(2020)
Journal Article
Energy Expenditure Equation Choice: Effects on Cycling Efficiency and its Reliability
(2020)
Journal Article
Functional Threshold Power in Cyclists: Validity of the Concept and Physiological Responses
(2018)
Journal Article
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Advanced Search