Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

An Application of PRECIS-2 to Evaluate Trial Design in a Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of a Community-based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Women Living in Disadvantaged Areas of Ireland

Darker, Catherine; Loudon, Kirsty; O'Connell, Nicola; Castello, Stefania; Burke, Emma; Vance, Joanne; Reynolds, Caitriona; Buggy, Aine; Dougall, Nadine; Williams, Pauline; Dobbie, Fiona; Bauld, Linda; Hayes, Catherine B

Authors

Catherine Darker

Kirsty Loudon

Nicola O'Connell

Stefania Castello

Emma Burke

Joanne Vance

Caitriona Reynolds

Aine Buggy

Pauline Williams

Fiona Dobbie

Linda Bauld

Catherine B Hayes



Abstract

Background
“We Can Quit2” (WCQ2) was a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial with an embedded process evaluation assessing the feasibility and acceptability of ‘We Can Quit’ (WCQ), a peer-delivered community-based stop-smoking programme for women in disadvantaged communities. The control group comprised ‘enhanced usual care’ offered by the Irish Health Service Executive (HSE). The PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2) is a tool to assess whether a trial design is more explanatory (working under ideal conditions) or pragmatic (working under ‘real world’ conditions). The aim of this paper was to retrospectively evaluate the WCQ2 pilot trial using PRECIS-2 to inform the decision-making process on progression to a future definitive trial (DT).

Methods
The WCQ2 trial protocol and HSE standard stop-smoking service were described across the nine PRECIS-2 domains: Eligibility, Recruitment, Setting, Organisation, Flexibility-Delivery, Flexibility-Adherence, Follow-up, Primary Outcome. Team members scored the domains as pragmatic or explanatory for each arm in a half-day workshop.

Results
Seven team members (practitioners and researchers) assessed the overall trial design as more explanatory than pragmatic. Important differences emerged between the two arms. WCQ targeted adult women from disadvantaged communities whereas HSE run a limited enhanced service for all quitters. Recruitment to trial was challenging, intense efforts were needed as the trial proceeded. WCQ was delivered in a non-clinical community setting, HSE services in a clinical setting. WCQ organisation was co-designed with community partners and comprises peer-to-peer group support delivered by trained lay community facilitators, whereas HSE one-to-one support is delivered by Smoking Cessation Officers with a clinical background. Only WCQ allowed flexibility in delivery and adherence. Follow-up was more intensive in WCQ. Greater efforts to improve participant retention will be required in a future DT.

Conclusions
PRECIS-2 allowed the reflection of practitioners and researchers on similarities and differences between intervention and control arms. Results will inform the decision on progression to an effectiveness DT, which will require more a pragmatic and less explanatory design. This novel use of PRECIS-2 to retrospectively evaluate a complex community-based pilot trial in advance of a full DT will also support learning for those undertaking hybrid trials of implementation and effectiveness.

Trial registration: This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (No. 74721694), available at https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN74721694

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 5, 2022
Online Publication Date Jan 25, 2022
Publication Date 2022
Deposit Date Jan 7, 2022
Publicly Available Date Feb 2, 2022
Print ISSN 2055-5784
Publisher BMC
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 8
Issue 1
Article Number 19
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-00969-6
Keywords PRECIS-2, Pragmatic trial, Process evaluation, Implementation, Smoking cessation, Women, Deprivation, Pilot and feasibility study, Trial design
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2832822

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations