Immobilized Artificial Membrane HPLC Derived Parameters vs PAMPA-BBB Data in Estimating in Situ Measured Blood–Brain Barrier Permeation of Drugs

Grumetto, Lucia; Russo, Giacomo; Barbato, Francesco

Abstract

The affinity indexes for phospholipids (log kWIAM) for 42 compounds were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on two different phospholipid-based stationary phases (immobilized artificial membrane, IAM), i.e., IAM.PC.MG and IAM.PC.DD2. The polar/electrostatic interaction forces between analytes and membrane phospholipids (Δlog kWIAM) were calculated as the differences between the experimental values of log kWIAM and those expected for isolipophilic neutral compounds having polar surface area (PSA) = 0. The values of passage through a porcine brain lipid extract (PBLE) artificial membrane for 36 out of the 42 compounds considered, measured by the so-called PAMPA-BBB technique, were taken from the literature (P0PAMPA-BBB). The values of blood–brain barrier (BBB) passage measured in situ, P0in situ, for 38 out of the 42 compounds considered, taken from the literature, represented the permeability of the neutral forms on “efflux minimized” rodent models. The present work was aimed at verifying the soundness of Δlog kWIAM at describing the potential of passage through the BBB as compared to data achieved by the PAMPA-BBB technique. In a first instance, the values of log P0PAMPA-BBB (32 data points) were found significantly related to the n-octanol lipophilicity values of the neutral forms (log PN) (r2 = 0.782) whereas no significant relationship (r2 = 0.246) was found with lipophilicity values of the mixtures of ionized and neutral forms existing at the experimental pH 7.4 (log D7.4) as well as with either log kWIAM or Δlog kWIAM values. log P0PAMPA-BBB related moderately to log P0in situ values (r2 = 0.604). The latter did not relate with either n-octanol lipophilicity indexes (log PN and log D7.4) or phospholipid affinity indexes (log kWIAM). In contrast, significant inverse linear relationships were observed between log P0in situ (38 data points) and Δlog kWIAM values for all the compounds but ibuprofen and chlorpromazine, which behaved as moderate outliers (r2 = 0.656 and r2 = 0.757 for values achieved on IAM.PC.MG and IAM.PC.DD2, respectively). Since log P0in situ refer to the “intrinsic permeability” of the analytes regardless their ionization degree, no correction for ionization of Δlog kWIAM values was needed. Furthermore, log P0in situ were found roughly linearly related to log BB values (i.e., the logarithm of the ratio brain concentration/blood concentration measured in vivo) for all the analytes but those predominantly present at the experimental pH 7.4 as anions. These results suggest that, at least for the data set considered, Δlog kWIAM parameters are more effective than log P0PAMPA-BBB at predicting log P0in situ values for all the analytes. Furthermore, ionization appears to affect differently, and much more markedly, BBB passage of acids (yielding anions) than that of the other ionizable compounds.

Citation

Grumetto, L., Russo, G., & Barbato, F. (2016). Immobilized Artificial Membrane HPLC Derived Parameters vs PAMPA-BBB Data in Estimating in Situ Measured Blood–Brain Barrier Permeation of Drugs. Molecular Pharmaceutics, 13(8), 2808-2816. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00397

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jul 5, 2016
• Online Publication Date: Jul 14, 2016
• Publication Date: 2016-08
• Deposit Date: May 4, 2020
• Journal: Molecular Pharmaceutics
• Print ISSN: 1543-8384
• Electronic ISSN: 1543-8392
• Publisher: American Chemical Society
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 8
• Pages: 2808-2816
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00397
• Keywords: immobilized artificial membrane, blood−brain barrier, parallel artificial membrane permeability assay, in situ brain perfusion, quantitative structure−properties relationships
• Public URL: http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2658243