Forensic occupational therapy to reduce risk of reoffending: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom

Connell, Catriona

Abstract

Forensic services are required to reduce an individual’s risk of reoffending. Despite being integral to forensic mental health services, the contribution of forensic occupational therapy to achieving this aim is unclear. This study describes current forensic occupational therapy practice to reduce reoffending risk in the United Kingdom. Responses to a cross-sectional survey consisting of multiple choice and free-text questions were analysed using frequency counts and percentages, and thematic analysis respectively. Of the 58 participants, 83% actively addressed reoffending risk. Participants informed practice with occupation-focused theories, models and assessment tools. Five themes described forensic occupational therapy to reduce reoffending risk: an occupational perspective of risk assessment and formulation; volitional realignment; increasing protective factors; community integration; and enhancing understanding of forensic occupational therapy. Forensic occupational therapists perceive their practice to contribute to reducing reoffending risk, but are yet to establish routine outcome measurement in this area. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

Citation

Connell, C. (2016). Forensic occupational therapy to reduce risk of reoffending: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 27(6), 907-928. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2016.1237535

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Sep 13, 2016
• Online Publication Date: Nov 4, 2016
• Publication Date: 2016-11
• Deposit Date: Nov 1, 2019
• Journal: The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology
• Print ISSN: 1478-9949
• Electronic ISSN: 1478-9957
• Publisher: Routledge
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 27
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 907-928
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2016.1237535
• Keywords: Occupational therapy, reoffending, recidivism, risk, desistance, protective factors
• Public URL: http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2275974