James Baxter
The relative influence of leading questions and negative feedback on response change on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (2): implications for forensic interviewing
Baxter, James; Charles, Kathy E; Martin, Michelle; McGroarty, Allan
Authors
Kathy E Charles
Michelle Martin
Allan McGroarty
Abstract
The ‘Shift’ or response change measure of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1 and 2) is assumed primarily to indicate acceptance of the negative feedback component of the GSS procedure. Using an adapted version of the question set that bears on the GSS 2 narrative, this study systematically varied the pressurising influences of the GSS 2 specifically to test this assumption. In four conditions, negative and neutral feedback were administered either with leading or non-leading questions. Varying type of feedback to participants resulted in significant differences in Shift scores. In line with the theorised bases of the scales, the leading questions component of the GSS was found to have no significant independent effect on Shift and to be no more effective than non-leading questions in influencing this measure. The study also lent support to two previous studies, which have shown that negative feedback in the absence of leading questions alters average response change to a reliable degree (10%), suggesting a useful norm for adapted versions of the GSS procedure. It is argued that the influence of feedback on response change in interviews merits more attention from researchers than it has previously received.
Citation
Baxter, J., Charles, K. E., Martin, M., & McGroarty, A. (2012). The relative influence of leading questions and negative feedback on response change on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (2): implications for forensic interviewing. Psychology, Crime and Law, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.631538
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2012 |
Deposit Date | Jun 26, 2012 |
Print ISSN | 1068-316X |
Electronic ISSN | 1477-2744 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Pages | 1-9 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.631538 |
Keywords | interrogative suggestibility; interrogative pressure; feedback; non-leading questions; eyewitness testimony; interrogation; interview procedures; interviewing; |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/5512 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.631538 |
You might also like
Perceptions of female narcissism in intimate partner violence: A thematic analysis
(2019)
Journal Article
Sensational Interests
(2017)
Book Chapter
How evil people choose their victims: The Dark Triad and perceptions of personality traits and vulnerability
(2016)
Presentation / Conference
Feederism
(2015)
Book