@article { , title = {Telemonitoring at scale for hypertension in primary care: An implementation study}, abstract = {Background While evidence from randomised controlled trials shows that telemonitoring for hypertension is associated with improved blood pressure (BP) control, healthcare systems have been slow to implement it, partly because of inadequate integration with existing clinical practices and electronic records. Neither is it clear if trial findings will be replicated in routine clinical practice at scale. We aimed to explore the feasibility and impact of implementing an integrated telemonitoring system for hypertension into routine primary care. Methods and findings This was a quasi-experimental implementation study with embedded qualitative process evaluation set in primary care in Lothian, Scotland. We described the overall uptake of telemonitoring and uptake in a subgroup of representative practices, used routinely acquired data for a records-based controlled before-and-after study, and collected qualitative data from staff and patient interviews and practice observation. The main outcome measures were intervention uptake, change in BP, change in clinician appointment use, and participants’ views on features that facilitated or impeded uptake of the intervention. Seventy-five primary care practices enrolled 3,200 patients with established hypertension. In an evaluation subgroup of 8 practices (905 patients of whom 427 [47\%] were female and with median age of 64 years [IQR 56–70, range 22–89] and median Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2012 decile of 8 [IQR 6–10]), mean systolic BP fell by 6.55 mm Hg (SD 15.17), and mean diastolic BP by 4.23 mm Hg (SD 8.68). Compared with the previous year, participating patients made 19\% fewer face-to-face appointments, compared with 11\% fewer in patients with hypertension who were not telemonitoring. Total consultation time for participants fell by 15.4 minutes (SD 68.4), compared with 5.5 minutes (SD 84.4) in non-telemonitored patients. The convenience of remote collection of BP readings and integration of these readings into routine clinical care was crucial to the success of the implementation. Limitations include the fact that practices and patient participants were self-selected, and younger and more affluent than non-participating patients, and the possibility that regression to the mean may have contributed to the reduction in BP. Routinely acquired data are limited in terms of completeness and accuracy. Conclusions Telemonitoring for hypertension can be implemented into routine primary care at scale with little impact on clinician workload and results in reductions in BP similar to those in large UK trials. Integrating the telemonitoring readings into routine data handling was crucial to the success of this initiative.}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pmed.1003124}, issn = {1549-1277}, issue = {6}, journal = {PLOS Medicine}, pages = {e1003124}, publicationstatus = {Published}, publisher = {Public Library of Science}, url = {http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2671051}, volume = {17}, keyword = {eHealth, Data linkage, Public health, Governance, Health, telemonitoring, hypertension, clinical practice, blood pressure}, year = {2020}, author = {Hammersley, Vicky and Parker, Richard and Paterson, Mary and Hanley, Janet and Pinnock, Hilary and Padfield, Paul and Stoddart, Andrew and Park, Hyeon Gyeong and Sheikh, Aziz and McKinstry, Brian} }